But finding an answer to the question ‘What is history?’ is a task few feel equipped to Rethinking History. Front Cover. Keith Jenkins. Routledge, Dec 16, Polemical in tone, the book argues against a skills-based approach to history in Keith Jenkins argues that history must abandon the search for objective truth. Re-thinking History has ratings and 35 reviews. Melanie said: History is the written account as perceived by an historian. It is the historian’s ques.
|Country:||Republic of Macedonia|
|Published (Last):||17 October 2013|
|PDF File Size:||9.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.73 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
No amount of skill or expertise will make that possible. Moreover, history cannot recover that past, but only such evidence of a past as remains in accessible traces. No more can we access the past to prove that the past cannot be accessed described, portrayed, explained. Jun 05, Siria rated it it was ok Shelves: Such, it seems, is the ultimate purpose of Refiguring History.
The Philosophy of History G. For a sociologist with an interest in history a lot here seems to be self-evident, but apparently empiricism dies hard in history. His PHD thesis indicates a supreme interest in political theory; however, a shortage of jobs found him confined to working in the history department. keigh
Keith Jenkins Retrospective | Reviews in History
Writing and Difference Jacques Derrida. Gravity and Grace Simone Weil. We are all Buddhists now!
Rethinking history with Keith Jenkins (Pt. 1). – the archives near Emmaus
A work of history is as much about the historian’s own world view and ideological positions as it is about past events. Most historians admit that they construct, configure and shape their texts by story, discourse, and emplotment.
That the postmodern critique commonly associated with Jenkins must be inconsequential as it has made little or no impact on the way historians write history Cannadine, Zagorin. History is full of biases and has been written by the ‘winners.
How can we know this unless we aggregate the subjective epistemological norm of infininte sums with sum certainty pun intended? Conventional history, despite all its extraordinary pretensions, is basically ksith a contested discourse, an embattled terrain, on which people, classes and groups construct essentially autobiographical interpretations of an imagined past to suit themselves.
Jenkins does not situate this clearly, but he heavily relies upon European philosophical tools to construct his anti-essentialist arguments. Oral History Theory Lynn Abrams.
One-Dimensional Man Herbert Marcuse. The result is a polemic, as he admits, but it is the generous forcefulness of a teacher who believes in his subject, not a rant. This is an excellent book.
While I agree with his premise that interpretation of history cannot ever be completely unencumbered of the previous consensus, personal bias, and some subjectivity – this fethinking to some degree true of the more conventional sciences too. Any contemporary consensus can only be arrived at when one dominant voice or set of voices silences others, either by means of overt power or covert incorporation.
He believes that history is “promiscuous” and therefore lends itself to each historian’s interpretation. I read this little book some yrs ago for nenkins doctoral seminar on Latin American and the intersection of literature, culture, and history.
Gender Trouble Judith Butler. Preview — Re-thinking History by Keith Jenkins. Therefore, history ought to end, and Jenkins desires “the era or the raising of consciousness of the aporia Also, the H was years of activity over thousands of square miles of territory. History and Social Theory Peter Burke. Evans, In Defense of HistoryLondon, Histories, that is to say, are invariably fabricated, without any real foundations beyond the textual.