Instruction (AFI) _IP, Management Of Aviation Critical Safety Items; Air Force Policy. Directive , AFMC Quality Assurance; and. Find the most up-to-date version of AFI at Engineering Additionally, this AF Instruction (AFI) implements the policies in management is contained in AFI , Air Force Acquisition Quality.
|Published (Last):||22 January 2012|
|PDF File Size:||19.76 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This assessment can also be performed as appropriate for different stages of assembly of components as identified in the integration sequence and available procedures. Establish and maintain the balance of stakeholder needs and project constraints, such as performance, usability, schedule, manufacturing, operational and supportability considerations, and life cycle cost. Specify measures and analysis procedures to address information needs. Applying this approach demands renewed dedication to defining, implementing, measuring, and maintaining the systems engineering processes that are fundamental to successfully delivering a technically sound capability.
Describe the approach to integrating systems engineering with overall project management efforts e. One way to meet these challenges is through the disciplined application of systems engineering, which provides the technical framework to enable sound decision making relative to trade studies among performance, supportability, cost, and schedule while considering risk.
TO D 01SEP USAF DEFICIENCY REPORTING
MG3 Manufacture the product in accordance with plans and specifications MG3P1 Ensure that production at desired aif is conducted according to the plan Description: Pay particular attention to external factors which could influence a product acquisition and sustainment over which the team may have little control. Air Force discusses the strategic value to the Air Force of owning the technical baseline and the risk of not owning it and highlights key aspects of how agencies other than the Air Force own the technical baseline for their acquisition programs.
Change existing cost, schedule, and performance baselines to accommodate the requirements change. Periodically review all plans to ensure they are clear, and integrated and consistent with one another.
While there are examples of successful weapon systems acquisition programs within the U. Verification and validation methods e. 63-50 for derived requirements that increase work scope for example in software as the development proceeds and the design understanding evolves.
RG1P1 Elicit stakeholder needs, expectations, constraints, and interfaces Description: Evaluate and accept the supplier products. Explore design space of feasible solutions. The configuration and change management affi enables the disciplined management and control of changes to the product and related work products. Ensure project risks are considered in planning activities.
Looking for other ways to read this?
Leadership assistance may include: Congressional and Department of Defense guidance emphasizes the need for sustained disciplined processes ati process improvement including the measurement of process performance.
Transitioning From Validation Determination C To Validation Assessment D Following completion of the self-assessment phase, if leadership has directed that a validation assessment be accomplished, actions are initiated to prepare for an independent validation.
Document the final decision with associated rationale and risks. Identify changes to evaluation criteria. Track corrective actions until subsequent verification activities confirm compliance with requirements.
VG4P2 Establish and maintain validation criteria, methods and procedures. DG2P2 Evaluate whether the product-components should be developed, purchased, or reused based on established criteria Description: Center and MAJCOM leadership need the information in a format that best enables them to view entire portfolios at the process level.
Estimates of the attributes of the work products and tasks are then used to bound the budget and schedule. Identify and maintain criteria for assigning enhancements responsibility. Risk handling methods include: Make all technical plans, designs, and specifications consistent with and traceable to documented requirements. The following paragraphs summarize what occurs during each phase of the process. Ensure that there is accountability for performing the process and achieving the specified results throughout the life of the process.
Specify how measurement data will be afo, stored, updated and presented. 63-5501 Establish and maintain engineering plans to accomplish project. Version September 51 Version September RG4P4 Identify and resolve inconsistencies between requirements, project plans, and work products Description: The responsibility for developing requirements down through the levels is generally split between the acquirer and the suppliers.
Maintain bi-directional traceability between system and allocated requirements. Document the description fai the alternative solutions and the rationale for selection. Validation Assessment Phase – D The validation assessment phase begins with a team meeting during which the team leader reviews the information prepared in paragraph 4. Well defined parameters provide common and consistent criteria for analyzing, prioritizing and mitigating the risks to be managed. To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and afu Enter.
CMG3P2 Perform configuration audits to maintain integrity of the configuration baselines Description: Document the interaction of the product with the aafi, other systems, and operational users. Register for a free account to start saving and receiving special member only perks.
All milestones and tasks are linked logically to provide a fully integrated afii demonstrating a critical path to each event as well as towards the completion of the program.
As each level of the product is defined, there is an iterative process of allocation, high-level design, and requirements definition for the next-lower level. Product integration can be conducted incrementally, using an iterative process of assembling product components, evaluating them, and then assembling larger collections of components.
Establish and maintain a hazards tracking database. Execute risk handling, including mitigation actions promptly. DG3P4 Conduct, prior to assembly product-component verification Description: